<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>MOUTHPIECE Blog - Latest Comments in A Study In Hypotheticals: Johnny Damon To The White Sox</title><link>http://mouthpieceblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mouthpieceblog.disqus.com/a_study_in_hypotheticals_johnny_damon_to_the_white_sox/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:46:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A Study In Hypotheticals: Johnny Damon To The White Sox</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2009/11/03/a-study-in-hypotheticals-johnny-damon-to-the-white-sox/#comment-33280523</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Figgins’ WAR was also 5.9 this past season, compared to Damon’s 2.8. Damon’s defense has regressed this season in left field for the Yankees. Outside of power numbers, Figgins is the better player. There’s not a lot of wiggle room for debate here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Djarum Black</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:46:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Study In Hypotheticals: Johnny Damon To The White Sox</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2009/11/03/a-study-in-hypotheticals-johnny-damon-to-the-white-sox/#comment-21766842</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We've done the old superstar routine enough already: Thome, Griffey, and to a lesser extent, Contreras.  We need youth: Figgins would be perfect, but it's really all about the pitching.  Sign Jenks. Now.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TI61</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:53:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>