<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>MOUTHPIECE Blog - Latest Comments in ESPN Could Still Get EPL In America, Hooray America</title><link>http://mouthpieceblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mouthpieceblog.disqus.com/espn_could_still_get_epl_in_america_hooray_america/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:49:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ESPN Could Still Get EPL In America, Hooray America</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2009/02/06/espn-could-still-get-epl-in-america-hooray-america/#comment-7399960</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What's the latest on the espn u.s. epl deal?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">evan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:49:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ESPN Could Still Get EPL In America, Hooray America</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2009/02/06/espn-could-still-get-epl-in-america-hooray-america/#comment-6056956</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I imagine most soccer fans in the US would be happy to see games on ESPN, if only because it would make games more accessible.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fox Soccer Channel does a great job, but ever since Setanta got a piece of the action, the games have been a) harder to see since Setanta is only available with certain providers and b) more expensive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A split between FSC and ESPN would work out nicely.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daryl</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:19:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>