<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>MOUTHPIECE Blog - Latest Comments in Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://mouthpieceblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:16:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-23524477</link><description>I agree, the end of the show had me laughing so hard. I hoped it wouldn't end, but like all good things, it did. I haven't seen it since, though and had forgot all about it until now!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">acting jobs</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:16:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-20692858</link><description>That’s the biggest philosophical difference between old media and new media: If a sportswriter at the Washington Post breaks a story the New York Times doesn’t have, the Post wins that day</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buy Music</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:47:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-20114069</link><description>If something legitimately interesting happens on any specific blog, it’s immediately going to be linked to on 200 other sites, so there’s no need to consistently go to any one source.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Indie_gig</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:33:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-20113850</link><description>Obama is totally a tucker. It's better than rocking the untucked, long polo &amp; sweats that I'm sure Jay Mariotti dons at the gym.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">free_stocks2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:28:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-19730750</link><description>They seemed different, and they had more voice. But now EVERYBODY wants to be funny. That’s all there is. You can’t blog about any subject without making some sort of obvious joke, and that kind of thinking has spilled into the mainstream media.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Managed_Hosting</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 03:56:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-17421968</link><description>Obama is totally a tucker. It's better than rocking the untucked, long polo &amp; sweats that I'm sure Jay Mariotti dons at the gym.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">free_stocks</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:12:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-13484148</link><description>Great interview</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cashadvancetoday</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:10:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-8253789</link><description>Great interview.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">randysocial007</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:09:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-5684872</link><description>While I enjoyed most of the interview, this mans ignorance when it comes to Olympics is just sad. Of course no one is forced to like the Olympics, but this is no excuse for ignorance.&lt;br&gt;Anyway, thanks for the interview, I learned a lot about Chuck.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seo cart</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:55:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-5139300</link><description>nice interview and coverage, let Obama do his job now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Busby SEO Test</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:36:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-4938025</link><description>If you didn't follow the events in Beijing, Chuck, it's best to admit you're not in the best position to answer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rac breakdown recovery uk</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:19:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-4341721</link><description>Great Interview, and salute to you, you have a great opportunity to interview Chuck Klosterman</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">baliinc</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:23:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-2783468</link><description>Chuck Klosterman Is my hero and not to mention rock guru!  He writes all the things I want to say!&lt;br&gt;For other mild hillarities check out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ijustdontgetit.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.ijustdontgetit.net&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:00:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-2218948</link><description>I think the impressive thing about Phelps is that he was able to participate in each of those events in one week and still dominate. I mean, even if you eat the equivalent of a baby elephant every day, you're still going to get tired eventually.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unless, of course, he juices.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Angevine</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:49:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-2191068</link><description>Never really cared for the guy, and care less (if possible) after his ignorant comment about Phelps. He didn't make the rules, just won the races presented to him. Get over it, Chuckie.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PMK</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:50:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-2186794</link><description>The blog chuck is describing with statistical number crunchin is BlazersEdge. It's the only blog worth reading op to bottom that I've found. Of course, it helps tremendously if you're a Blazers fan.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zig</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:05:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-2184228</link><description>This interview made me purchase a book and grow a beard. Well done, R.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 13:11:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-2152328</link><description>Chuck needs new specs, JJ is by far the hottest.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brosallman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:03:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-2148305</link><description>@ScottyF311 They do have different types of fencing, sabre, foil, etc... but otherwise you're right&lt;br&gt;@sandy Believe me, he does know.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:01:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-2145139</link><description>He raises a good point though. Why are there so many distances and strokes? Why don't we have different basketball games with different amounts of players? Hammer throws with varying weights of hammer and varying shapes of field? Fencing with knives? Really tiny ping pong tables?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ScottyF311</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:09:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-2144728</link><description>I love Chuck.  But the 100m hurdles is basically a "different stroke" for running.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nixforsix</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:42:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-2144531</link><description>Ridiculous.  Obama would totally choose Kevin Garnett.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mac</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:29:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-2144199</link><description>Obama is totally a tucker. It's better than rocking the untucked, long polo &amp; sweats that I'm sure Jay Mariotti dons at the gym.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:10:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-2143803</link><description>self-righteous.  What a tool.  Those who think they know just don't know</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:46:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our Interview With Chuck Klosterman</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2008/09/04/our-interview-with-chuck-klosterman/#comment-2137349</link><description>Six strong questions, five good answers. If you didn't follow the events in Beijing, Chuck, it's best to admit you're not in the best position to answer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Nice get, Ryan.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JCN</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:34:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>