<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>MOUTHPIECE Blog - Latest Comments in The Timing Of Barack Obama&amp;#8217;s Copenhagen Announcement</title><link>http://mouthpieceblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mouthpieceblog.disqus.com/the_timing_of_barack_obama8217s_copenhagen_announcement/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:25:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Timing Of Barack Obama&amp;#8217;s Copenhagen Announcement</title><link>http://www.mouthpiecesports.com/blog/2009/09/28/the-timing-of-barack-obamas-copenhagen-announcement/#comment-17753645</link><description>&lt;p&gt; No, the 4th option was that our native son needed assurances that Chicago would indeed be chosen host city. President Obama can't go to Copenhagen to back a losing bid. Hopefully the Chicago pols have their ducks in a row. I'd hate to see the heat domestically (republican) if the leader of the free world backs a loser.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brosallman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:25:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>